
|
ACTIV- ITIES |
STAGES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA/R | AP | CT | ST | OF | |
| PL | SP | TP | OP | OP | OP |
| EG | PK | DK | EofO | EofM | CFS |
| EE | AR1 | DR*2 | DR*3 | AR4 | AR5 |
| DM | A/R | AA | CR? | CAB | AO |
In each audit stage, auditors undertake certain evidence evaluation activities. In the client acceptance stage, based on the auditor's preliminary knowledge of the client's business, the auditor evaluates the acceptable audit risk AR*1 and the (achievable) audit risk AR1 at the financial statement level, and then estimates whether audit evidence of sufficient quantity and appropriate quality has been gathered in order to make the decision to accept (retain) the entity as a client.
For example, assume, based on the nature of the entity's business and operations, its control environment as well as the audit firm's independence and competence, that IR1, CR1 and DR1 are evaluated as HIGH, MODERATE and LOW respectively. Using the audit risk model, AR1 is evaluated as LOW.
Finally the auditor evaluates whether he/ she has gathered evidence of sufficient quantity and appropriate quality, based on both its relevance and reliability, to make the accept/ retain decision. If not, further evidence is gathered.
After the auditor has concluded the estimations and evaluations above, the accept/retain (reject/relinquish) decision is made. Refer to the next activity.
Copyright, Australian Educational Research Pty Ltd. Any person accessing this site agrees to the Terms of Use.