
|
ACTIV- ITIES |
STAGES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA/R | AP | CT | ST | OF | |
| PL | SP | TP | OP | OP | OP |
| EG | PK | DK | EofO | EofM | CFS |
| EE | AR1 | DR*2 | DR*3 | AR4 | AR5 |
| DM | A/R | AA | CR? | CAB | AO |
After the auditor gathers evidence in the control testing stage, the auditor evaluates the evidence, and in particular, arrives at a value for control risk, CR3. If the auditor becomes aware of new information relating to the previous evaluations of the acceptable audit risk and inherent risk, then this information is used to arrive at values for AR*3 and IR3. Otherwise, AR*3 and IR3 assume the same values as AR*2 and IR2.
The values of AR*3, IR3 and CR3 enable a value for the revised acceptable detection risk to be determined ( DR*3 = AR*3 / IR3 x CR3).
Thus, for each account balance assertion, the auditor evaluates:
If the auditor finds an unacceptable level of control deviations, then the auditor will re-evaluate control risk . The more unacceptable deviations found, the higher the value of control risk. Control risk CR3 is re-evaluated as LOW, MODERATE or HIGH.
Finally, the auditor considers whether s/he has gathered evidence of sufficient quantity and appropriate quality, based on its relevance and reliability to make a decision as to whether reliance on internal controls should continue. If not, the auditor gathers further evidence. When the auditor considers that sufficient, appropriate evidence has been gathered, the auditor proceeds to the decision as to continued reliance. Refer to the next activity.
Copyright, Australian Educational Research Pty Ltd. Any person accessing this site agrees to the Terms of Use.