
|
ACTIV- ITIES |
STAGES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA/R | AP | CT | ST | OF | |
| PL | SP | TP | OP | OP | OP |
| EG | PK | DK | EofO | EofM | CFS |
| EE | AR1 | DR*2 | DR*3 | AR4 | AR5 |
| DM | A/R | AA | CR? | CAB | AO |
A comparison of the (achievable) audit risk, AR4, with the (revised) evaluation of the acceptable audit risk, AR*4, assists the auditor in arriving at a conclusion about the completeness, validity and accuracy of individual account balances.
If, for an individual account balance assertion, AR4 is less than or equal to AR*4, then the auditor may conclude that there is an acceptable risk that the audited account balance is not materially misstated. Otherwise, the auditor may conclude that the risk is unacceptable. In the latter instance, this will affect the achievable audit risk AR5 evaluated by the auditor in the next, opinion formulation, stage of the audit.
The auditor notes all misstatements, whether material or not, in the audit working papers on a schedule of audit differences.
This completes the fourth audit stage. The next activity is that of operational planning in the opinion formulation stage.
Copyright, Australian Educational Research Pty Ltd. Any person accessing this site agrees to the Terms of Use.