Bibliography and references

Bibliography

Ashton A.H. and R.H. Ashton [1988], Sequential belief revision in auditing , The Accounting Review, October, 623-41.

Ashton, R. H. and P. R. Brown [1980], Descriptive model of auditors' internal control judgements: Replication and extension, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 269-277.

Biggs, S.F and T.J. Mock [1983], An Investigation of Auditor Decision Porcesses in the Evaluation of Internal Controls and Audit Scope Decisions, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring Vol. 2, 235-255.

Cushing, B.E. [1987], An Analysis of Structured Audit Methodologies in Large CPA Firms, Seminar paper, University of New South Wales.

Cushing, B.E and J.K. Loebbecke [1983], Analytical approaches to audit risk: A survey and analysis, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall, 23- 41.

Cushing, B.E. and J.K. Loebbecke [1986], Comparison of Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms, American Accounting Association.

DePree, C.M. [1989], Testing and Evaluating a Conceptual Framework of Accounting, Abacus, September, Vol. 25, No. 2, 61-73.

Dyckman, T.R., M. Gibbins and R.J.Sweringa [1978], Experimental and Survey Research in Financial Accounting: A Review and Evaluation, in A.R. Abdel-Kalik and T.F. Keller, eds, The Impact of Accounting Research on Practice and Disclosure, Duke University, 48-105.

Einhorn, H.J and R.M. Hogarth [1981], Behavioral Decision Theory: Process of Judgement and Choice, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 32, 52-58.

Einhorn, H.J and R.M. Hogarth [1981], Behavioral Decision Theory: Process of Judgement and Choice, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 32, 52-58.

Felix, W.F. Jr and W.R. Kinney [1982], Research in the Auditor's Opinion Formulation Process: State of the Art, The Accounting Review, April, 245-271.

Gibbins, M. [1984], Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 103-25.

Goennedes, N.J. and N. Dopuch [1974], A Reply, in Studies on Financial Accounting Objectives, Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), 158-69.

Grobstein, M and P.W. Craig [1984], A Risk Analysis Approach to Auditing, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1-16.

Guy, D. M. and J.D. Sullivan [1988], The Expectations Gap and Auditing Standards, Journal of Accountancy, April, 36-47.

Holstrum, G.M. and T.J. Mock [1985], Audit Judgement and Evidence Evaluation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall, Vol. 5, No. 1, 101-108.

Holmes, H. [1995], Auditing: An Activity Based Risk Evaluation Methodology, Australian Educational Research, Sydney.

Kinney, W.R. Jr [1983], A Note on Compounding Probabilities in Auditing, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring, Vol. 2, No. 2, 13-22.

Libby, R. [1981], Accounting and Human Information Processing: Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J..

Mautz, R.K. and H.A. Sharaf [1961], The Philosophy of Auditing, American Accounting Association.

Toba, Y. [1975], A General Theory of Evidence as the Conceptual Foundation in Auditing Theory,The Accounting Review, January, 7-24.

Tubbs, R.M., W.F. Messier, and W.R Knechel [1990], Recency effects in the auditor's belief revision process , The Accounting Review , April, 452-60.

Waller, W.S. amd W.L. Felix Jr [1984], Cognition and the Auditor's Opinion Formulation Process; A Schematic of Interactions Between Memory and Currnet Audit Evidence, in S. Moriarty and E. Joyce, eds, Decision Making and Accounting, University of Oklahoma Press, Normanton, Ok.


References

Ameen, E and J.R. Strawser [1994], Investigating the use of analytical procedures: An update and extension , Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall, 69-76. [Refer to Analytical procedures]

Arnold, V., P.A. Collier, S.A. Leech and S.G. Sutton [2001], “The Impact of Political Pressure on Novice Decision Makers: Are Auditors Qualified to Make Going-Concern Judgments?, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12, 333–338. [Refer to Going concern]

Asare, S.K. [1992], The auditor's going concern decision: Interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence , The Accounting Review , April, 379-393. [Refer to Evidence evaluation activities]

Ashton, R. H. [1974], An experimental study of internal control judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 143-157. [Refer to Reliability of audit evidence]

Ashton A.H. and R.H. Ashton [1988], Sequential belief revision in auditing , The Accounting Review, October, 623-41. [Refer to Evidence gathering activities]

Ashton, R. H. and P. R. Brown [1980], Descriptive model of auditors' internal control judgements: Replication and extension, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 269-277. [Refer to Reliability of audit evidence]

Bamber, E.M. and V. Iyer [2007], Auditors' Identification with Their Clients and Its Effect on Auditors' Objectivity , Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, November 1-24. [Refer to Auditor independence]

Beaulieu P.R [2001], The Effects of Judgments of New Clients’ Integrity upon Risk Judgments, Audit Evidence, and Fees , Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, September. [Refer to Inherent risk evaluation]

Bédard J., S. M. Chtourou, and L. Courteau [2004],The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise, Independence, and Activity on Aggressive Earnings Management, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, September. [Refer to Audit committee]

Bell, T. and W.R. Kneckel [1994], Empirical analyses of errors discovered in audits of property and casualty insurers , Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring, 84-100. [Refer to Misstatements]

Bierstaker J.L. and A. Wright [2004], Does the Adoption of a Business Risk Audit Approach Change Internal Control Documentation and Testing Practices? , International Journal of Auditing , March, 67-78. [Refer to Business risk]

Biggs, S. F. and J. J. Wild [1985], An investigation of auditor judgment in analytical review, The Accounting Review, October, 607-633. [Refer to Analytical procedures]

Blokdijk H., F. Drieenhuizen, D. A. Simunic, and M. T. Stein [2003], Factors Affecting Auditors’ Assessments of Planning Materiality, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, September. [Refer to Planing materiality]

Blokdijk H., F. [2004], Tests of Control in the Audit Risk Model: Effective? Efficient?, International Journal of Auditing, July, 185-194.

Blouin, J., B.M Grein and B.R. Rountree [2007], An Analysis of Forced Auditor Change: The Case of Former Arthur Andersen Clients , The Accounting Review, May, 621-650. [Refer to Auditor independence]

Brandon, D.M. and J.M. Mueller [2008], The influence of jurors' perceptions of auditor tenure on blame, Advances in Accounting, (Article in press). [Refer to Auditor independence]

Braun, K.W. [2001], The Disposition of Audit-Detected Misstatements: An Examination of Risk and Reward Factors and Aggregation Effects, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 71–99. [Refer to Auditor's opinion; Reporting materiality; Misstatements; Schedule of audit differences]

Brown, R.G. [1962], Changing audit objectives and techniques, The Accounting Review, August, 696-702. [Refer to History of auditing]

Carcello, J.V. and A. L. Nagy [2004], Audit Firm Tenure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, September, 55-69. [Refer to Auditor independence]

Carey P.J. and B. Clarke [2001], An Investigation of Australian Auditors’ Use of the Management Representation Letter, British Accounting Review, Vol. 33, 1–21. [Refer to Management representation letter]

Carey P. and R. Simnett [2006], Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Quality, The Accounting Review, May. [Refer to Auditor independence]

Cohen J.R., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. M. Wright [2000] , Evidence on the Effect of Financial and Nonfinancial Trends on Analytical Review , Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring. [Refer to Analytical procedures]

Cohen J., L.M. Gaynor, G. Krishnamoorthy and A.M. Wright [2008] , Academic Research on Communications Among External Auditors, the Audit Committee, and the Board: Implications and Recommendations for Practice, Current Issues in Auditing, Spring A1-A8. [Refer to Audit committee]

Cushing, B.E and J.K. Loebbecke [1983], Analytical approaches to audit risk: A survey and analysis, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall, 23- 41. [Refer to Audit risk concepts; Achievable audit risk]

Davis, J.T. [1996], Experience and Auditors' Selection of Relevant Information for Preliminary Control Risk Assessments, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring, 16-37. [Refer to Reliability of audit evidence]

DeZoort F.T., D. R. Hermanson, and R. W. Houston [2003], Audit Committee Support for Auditors: The Effects of Materiality Justification and Accounting Precision,Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 22, 175–199. [Refer to Reporting materiality]

Dikolli, S.S., S.A. McCracken, and J.B. Walawski [2004], Audit-Planning Judgments and Client-Employee Compensation Contracts, Behavioral Research in Accounting, March. [Refer to Inherent risk evaluation]

Dusenbury, R.B., J. L. Reimers, and S. W. Wheeler [2000], The Audit Risk Model: An Empirical Test for Conditional Dependencies among Assessed Component Risks, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, November. [Refer to Limitations]

Elliott, R. K., Unique audit methods: Peat Marwick International, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 2 No.2, Spring, 1-12. [Refer to Planning materiality]

Elder, R.J. and R.D. Allen [2003], A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Auditor Risk Assessments and Sample Size Decisions,The Accounting Review, October. [Refer to Sample size]

Fukukawa H., T.J. Mock and A. Wright [2006], Audit Programs and Audit Risk: A Study of Japanese Practice,International Journal of Auditing, March 41-46. [Refer to Audit approach; Business risk; Nature, timing and extent]

Geiger, M. A. and D. V. Rama [2006], Audit Firm Size and Going-Concern Reporting Accuracy ,Accounting Horizons, March. [Refer to Audit opinion; Going concern]

Ghosh, A. and D. Moon [2005], Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality,The Accounting Review, April. [Refer to Auditor independence]

Gibbins, M. [1984] Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 103-25. [Refer to Evidence gathering activities]

Gillett, P.R and N. Uddin [2005], CFO Intentions of Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, May 55-75. [Refer to Inherent risk evaluation]

Glover, S.M., D. F. Prawitt and T. J. Wilks [2005], Why Do Auditors Over-Rely on Weak Analytical Procedures? The Role of Outcome and Precision, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Supplement 197-220. [Refer to Analytical procedures]

Hall, T.W., T. L. Herron, B. J. Pierce, and T. J. Witt [2001], The Effectiveness of Increasing Sample Size to Mitigate the Influence of Population Characteristics in Haphazard Sampling , Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, March. [Refer to Haphazard selection]

Haskins, M.E. [1987], Client control environments: An examination of auditors' perceptions, The Accounting Review, July, 542-563. [Refer to Control environment]

Herbohn, K. and V. Ragunathan [2008], Auditor reporting and earnings management: some additional evidence, Accounting & Finance, (Article in press). [Refer to Fraud]

Houston, R.W., M.F. Peters, and J.H. Pratt [1999], The Audit Risk Model, Business Risk and Audit-Planning Decisions, The Accounting Review , July. [Refer to Strategic planning]

Joe, J.R. [2003], Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion?, Journal of Accounting Research, March, 109-133. [Refer to Consistency of financial statements]

Johnstone, K.M. [2000], Client-Acceptance Decisions: Simultaneous Effects of Client Business Risk, Audit Risk, Auditor Business Risk, and Risk Adaptation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, May. [Refer to Strategic planning]

Johnstone, K.M. and J.C. Bedard [2003], Risk Management in Client Acceptance Decisions, The Accounting Review, October. [Refer to Strategic planning]

Kaminski K.A., T. S. Wetzel, and G. Liming [2004], Can Financial Ratios Detect Fraudulent Financial Reporting?, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 19, 15–28. [Refer to Analytical procedures; Fraud]

Kaplan, S.E., E. F. O'Donnell, and B.M. Arel [2008], The Influence of Auditor Experience on the Persuasiveness of Information Provided by Management, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27[1], May, 67-83.[Refer to Delegation, supervision and review]

Kinney, W.R. and W.C. Uecker, [1982], Mitigating the consequences of anchoring in auditor judgments, The Accounting Review, January, 55-69. [Refer to Analytical procedures]

Kinney, W.R. Z-V. Palmrose and S. Scholz (2004], Auditor Independence, Non-Audit Services, and Restatements: Was the U.S. Government Right?, Journal of Accounting Research, June, 561-588. [Refer to Audit committee; Auditor independence]

Kizirian T.G., B.W. Mayhew, and L.D. Sneathen, Jr. [2005], The Impact of Management Integrity on Audit Planning and Evidence, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, November. [Refer to Inherent risk evaluation]

Knapp C.A. and M.C. Knapp [2001], The Effects of Experience and Explicit Fraud Risk Assessment in Detecting Fraud with Analytical Procedures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26, No. 1, 25–37. [Refer to Fraud]

Kneckel, W.R. [2000], Behavioral Research in Auditing and Its Impact on Audit Education, Issues in Accounting Education, November. [Refer to Executive summary]

Kneckel, W.R. [2007], The business risk audit: Origins, obstacles and opportunities,Accounting, Organizations and Society, May-July, 383-408. [Refer to Business risk]

Krogstad J.L., Taylor M.H., and Stock M.J. [2002], An Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of Lawyers' Letters, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, March, Vol.21, No. 1, 79-93. [Refer to Legal representation letter]

Krishnan, J., H. Sami and Y. Zhang [2005], Does the Provision of Nonaudit Services Affect Investor Perceptions of Auditor Independence?, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, November 111-13. [Refer to Audit committee; Auditor independence]

Lennox C. [2000], Do Companies Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Evidence from the UK, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 29, 321–337. [Refer to Audit committee]

Liggio, C. D. [1974], The Expectation Gap: The Accountant's Waterloo, Journal of Contemporary Business, Vol.3, No.3, 27-44. [Refer to Expectation gap]

Lee, B.H.Y., V. Mande and R. Ortman [2004], The Effect of Audit Committee and Board of Director Independence on Auditor Resignation, Auditing: A Joutrnal of Practice and Theory, September. [Refer to Audit committee]

Low, K-Y, [2004], The Effects of Industry Specialization on Audit Risk Assessments and Audit-Planning Decisions, The Accounting Review, January. [Refer to Inherent risk evaluation]

McDaniel, L.S., and L.E. Simmons [2007], Auditors' Assessment and Incorporation of Expectation Precision in Evidential Analytical Procedures, Auditing: A Joutrnal of Practice and Theory, May 1-18. [Refer to Analytical procedures]

Majid A., F. A. Gul, and J. S. L. Tsui [2001], An Analysis of Hong Kong Auditors’ Perceptions of the Importance of Selected Red Flag Factors in Risk Assessment, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 32, 263–274. [Refer to Inherent risk evaluation]

Maletta, M.J. and A.A. Gramling [1999], The Role of Internal Audit in the Financial Statement Audit Process, The Auditor's Report, Vol. 22, No. 3, 12-14. [Refer to Control environment]

McEnroe J.E. and S.C. Martens [2001], Auditors’ and Investors’ Perceptions of the “Expectation Gap”, Accounting Horizons, December. [Refer to Expectation gap]

McVay S.E. [2006], Earnings Management Using Classification Shifting: An Examination of Core Earnings and Special Items, The Accounting Review, May. [Refer to Fraud]

Messier,W, F., Eilifsen, A. and Austen, L. [2004], Auditor Detected Misstatements and the Effect of Information Technology, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 223-235. [Refer to Internal control procedures; Misstatements]

Mock T.J. and A.M. Wright [1999], Are Audit Program Plans Risk-Adjusted?, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring. [Refer to Planning: control testing; Planning: substantive testing]

Patterson, E.R. and R. Smith [2003], Materiality Uncertainty and Earnings Misstatement, The Accounting Review , July. [Refer to Reporting materiality]

Porter, B. [1993], An Empirical Study of the Audit Expectation-Performance Gap, Accounting and Business Research, Vol.24, No.93, 49-68. [Refer to Expectation gap]

Rezaee Z., A. Sharbatoghlie, R. Elam, and P.L. McMickle [2002], Continuous Auditing: Building Automated Auditing Capability, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, March. [Refer to CAATs]

Shelton, S.W. [1999], The Effect of Experience on the Use of Irrelevant Evidence in Auditor Judgment, The Accounting Review, April. [Refer to Reliability of audit evidence; Relevance of audit evidence]

Stewart M. and J. Dunn [2000], Introducing Audit Sampling, The Auditor's Report, Vol. 23, No. 3, 15-16. [Refer to Haphazard selection]

Stewart J. and L. Munro [2007], The Impact of Audit Committee Existence and Audit Committee Meeting Frequency on the External Audit: Perceptions of Australian Auditors, International Journal of Auditing, March 51-69. [Refer to Control environment]

Taylor M.H. [2000], The Effects of Industry Specialization on Auditors’ Inherent Risk Assessments and Confidence Judgements, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 693–712. [Refer to Inherent risk evaluation]

Tuttle B., M. Coller, and R. D. Plumlee [2002], The Effect of Misstatements on Decisions of Financial Statement Users: An Experimental Investigation of Auditor Materiality Thresholds, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, March. [Refer to Reporting materiality]

Vasarhelyi. M.A., M.G. Alles, and A. Kogan [2004], Principles of Analytic Monitoring for Continuous Assurance, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, Vol. 1. [Refer to CAATs]

Wright, A.M. and J.C. Bedard [2000], Decision Processes in Audit Evidential Planning: A Multistage Investigation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, May. [Refer to Audit approach; Natute, timing and extent]

Zim, K.Z., A.M. Fraser and D.J. Hatherly [2003], Auditor Analytial Review Judgment: A Performance Evaluation, British Accounting Review, Vol. 35, 19-34.[Refer to Reliability of audit evidence]

Zhu, S.Z. [2000], Auditor Resignations: Clientele Effects and Legal Liability, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 29, 173–205. [Refer to Strategic planning]

Back to
Copyright, Australian Educational Research Pty Ltd. Any person accessing this site agrees to the Terms of Use.